Which statement is incorrect regarding a licensee's duty to inspect real estate?

The statement asserting that a buyer's agent does not need to inspect a property is incorrect because it misrepresents the licensee's responsibilities. While it is true that a buyer's agent is not legally obligated to conduct a physical inspection of every property, doing so is often in the agent's best interest and the interest of their clients.

Inspecting properties allows agents to identify potential issues and convey these details to their clients, ultimately protecting the clients from unforeseen problems. Furthermore, thorough knowledge of a property through an inspection can enhance an agent's ability to provide informed advice, particularly in negotiation scenarios.

In contrast, other responsibilities implied in the correct answers, such as the necessity to disclose any known defects (which is a vital part of maintaining trust and transparency in real estate transactions) support the view that a buyer's agent should actively engage in understanding the condition of properties. Thus, while a buyer's agent may technically have the option not to inspect, doing so is strongly advisable and aligns with the agent's duty to act in the best interest of their clients.