Under administrative rules, which practice is acceptable when using approved forms?

The acceptable practice when using approved forms is crossing out language on the form as long as the stricken language remains legible. This approach allows parties to modify specific terms of an agreement while ensuring that the original language can still be interpreted if needed. Maintaining legibility of the stricken language is crucial because it ensures transparency and avoids misunderstandings between parties regarding what has been altered in the agreement.

In contrast, adding additional terms without notifying the other party can lead to discrepancies and legal disputes, as it may not be clear whether all parties are in agreement with these new terms. Altering a form after it has been signed undermines the integrity of the signed contract, as it can change the agreed-upon terms without mutual consent. Using a different form without permission also poses issues, as it may not comply with the established standards or might not protect the interests of the parties involved correctly. Therefore, crossing out language and ensuring legibility is the correct and acceptable practice in this context.